Microbial hyaluronic acid production in the 21 century: a roadmap toward high production, tailored molecular weight

Authors

  • Matheus Lopes Harth
  • Felipe Fernando Furlan
  • Antonio Carlos Luperni Horta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv22n3-185

Keywords:

hyaluronic acid, microbial production, streptococcus, cultivation

Abstract

Hyaluronic acid is a biopolymer that has gained attention from both researchers and the public since its discovery in 1934. In 2022, its global annual demand was 667 MT, with a market value of 9.4 billion dollars and an expected compound growth rate of 7.7% from 2024 and 2030. Such popularity lies in its many applications, which ranges from pharmaceutical to Tissue Engineering. Its molecular weight (MW) determines which application hyaluronic acid is better suited for: high MW (over 1 MDa) is used in medical applications such as osteoarthritis and ophthalmology, and low MW (less than 0.05 MDa) are suited for moisturizing cosmeceuticals. This makes hyaluronic acid molecular weight an important parameter for its production. The first industrial process was based on extraction from rooster combs. However, it shifted toward microbial production with Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Studies focus on improving its production and tailoring its molecular weight by accessing optimum temperature, pH, aeration, agitation, carbon, and nitrogen sources concentration and origin. his review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on the effects of metabolic and environmental factors in microbial hyaluronic acid production. The review shows that there has been extensive research in optimizing cultivation medium composition, temperature, pH, and aeration between 2018 and 2023, but further studies are required to optimize the metabolism of S. zooepidemicus towards maximum biopolymer production and molecular weight.

References

ABDULLAH THAIDI, N. I. et al. Development of In Situ Product Recovery (ISPR) System Using Amberlite IRA67 for Enhanced Biosynthesis of Hyaluronic Acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Life, v. 13, n. 2, 2023.

AMADO, I. R. et al. Microbial production of hyaluronic acid from agro-industrial by-products: Molasses and corn steep liquor. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 117, p. 181–187, 2017.

ARMSTRONG, D. C.; COONEY, M. J.; JOHNS, M. R. Growth and amino acid requirements of hyaluronic-acid-producing Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 47, n. 3, p. 309–312, 1997.

ARMSTRONG, D. C.; JOHNS, M. R. Culture conditions affect the molecular weight properties of hyaluronic acid produced by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 63, n. 7, p. 2759–2764, 1997.

ARSLAN, N. P.; AYDOGAN, M. N. Evaluation of Sheep Wool Protein Hydrolysate and Molasses as Low-Cost Fermentation Substrates for Hyaluronic Acid Production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus ATCC 35246. Waste and Biomass Valorization, v. 12, n. 2, p. 925–935, 2021.

ATTIA, Y. A.; KOBEASY, M. I.; SAMER, M. Evaluation of magnetic nanoparticles influence on hyaluronic acid production from Streptococcus equi. Carbohydrate Polymers, v. 192, p. 135–142, 2018.

BADLE, S. S.; JAYARAMAN, G.; RAMACHANDRAN, K. B. Ratio of intracellular precursors concentration and their flux influences hyaluronic acid molecular weight in Streptococcus zooepidemicus and recombinant Lactococcus lactis. Bioresource Technology, v. 163, p. 222–227, 2014.

BLANK, L. M.; MCLAUGHLIN, R. L.; NIELSEN, L. K. Stable production of hyaluronic acid in Streptococcus zooepidemicus chemostats operated at high dilution rate. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, v. 90, n. 6, p. 685–693, 20 jun. 2005.

CHAHUKI, F. F. et al. Hyaluronic acid production enhancement via genetically modification and culture medium optimization in Lactobacillus acidophilus. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, v. 121, p. 870–881, jan. 2019.

CHEN, M. et al. Biosynthesis of hyaluronan in engineered Escherichia coli via the secretion of thermophilic exo-mannanase using palm kernel cake as the carbon source. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 177, p. 108254, 2022.

CHEN, S.-J. et al. Fermentation process development for hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus ATCC 39920. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, v. 26, n. 2, p. 428–432, 2009a.

CHEN, W. Y. et al. Hyaluronan molecular weight is controlled by UDP-N-acetylglucosamine concentration in Streptococcus zooepidemicus. The Journal of biological chemistry, v. 284, n. 27, p. 18007–18014, jul. 2009b.

CHEN, W. Y. et al. The Role of Hyaluronic Acid Precursor Concentrations in Molecular Weight Control in Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Molecular Biotechnology, v. 56, n. 2, p. 147–156, 2014.

CHONG, B. F. et al. Microbial hyaluronic acid production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 66, n. 4, p. 341–351, 2005.

CHONG, B. F.; NIELSEN, L. K. Aerobic cultivation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus and the role of NADH oxidase. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 16, n. 2, p. 153–162, 2003a.

CHONG, B. F.; NIELSEN, L. K. Amplifying the cellular reduction potential of Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Journal of Biotechnology, v. 100, n. 1, p. 33–41, 9 jan. 2003b.

DEANGELIS, P. L. Glycosaminoglycan polysaccharide biosynthesis and production: today and tomorrow. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 94, n. 2, p. 295–305, 2012.

DELLA SALA, F. et al. Advances in Hyaluronic‐Acid‐Based (Nano)Devices for Cancer Therapy. Macromolecular Bioscience, p. 2100304, 2021.

DUAN, X.-J. et al. Effect of oxygen and shear stress on molecular weight of hyaluronic acid. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 18, n. 4, p. 718—724, 2008.

FERREIRA, R. G. et al. Techno-Economic Analysis of a Hyaluronic Acid Production Process Utilizing Streptococcal Fermentation. Processes, v. 9, n. 2, 2021.

FLORES-MÉNDEZ, D. A. et al. Bored Coffee Beans for Production of Hyaluronic Acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Fermentation, v. 7, n. 3, p. 121, 2021.

GEDIKLI, S. et al. Optimization of hyaluronic acid production and its cytotoxicity and degradability characteristics. Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology, v. 48, n. 7, p. 610–618, 2018.

GOMES, A. M. V. et al. Heterologous Hyaluronic Acid Production in Kluyveromyces lactis. Microorganisms, v. 7, n. 9, p. 294, 2019.

HASEGAWA, S. et al. Productivity of concentrated hyaluronic acid using a Maxblend® fermentor. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, v. 88, n. 1, p. 68–71, 1999.

HOFFMANN, J.; ALTENBUCHNER, J. Hyaluronic acid production with Corynebacterium glutamicum: effect of media composition on yield and molecular weight. Journal of Applied Microbiology, v. 117, n. 3, p. 663–678, 2014.

HUANG, W.-C.; CHEN, S.-J.; CHEN, T.-L. The role of dissolved oxygen and function of agitation in hyaluronic acid fermentation. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 32, n. 3, p. 239–243, 2006.

HUANG, W.-C.; CHEN, S.-J.; CHEN, T.-L. Production of hyaluronic acid by repeated batch fermentation. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 40, n. 3, p. 460–464, 2008.

HUBBARD, C. et al. The Hyaluronan Synthase Catalyzes the Synthesis and Membrane Translocation of Hyaluronan. Journal of Molecular Biology, v. 418, n. 1, p. 21–31, 2012.

IM, J.-H. et al. Optimization of medium components for high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus sp. ID9102 via a statistical approach. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, v. 36, n. 11, p. 1337, 2009.

JAGANNATH, S.; RAMACHANDRAN, K. B. Influence of competing metabolic processes on the molecular weight of hyaluronic acid synthesized by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 48, n. 2, p. 148–158, 15 jan. 2010.

JEEVA, P. et al. Production of controlled molecular weight hyaluronic acid by glucostat strategy using recombinant Lactococcus lactis cultures. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 103, n. 11, p. 4363–4375, 2019.

JUNG, H. Hyaluronidase: An overview of its properties, applications, and side effects. Archives of plastic surgery, v. 47, n. 4, p. 297–300, jul. 2020.

KARAMI, M. et al. Preparation, purification, and characterization of low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid. Biotechnology Letters, v. 43, n. 1, p. 133–142, 2021.

KIM, S.-J.; PARK, S.-Y.; KIM, C.-W. A Novel Approach to the Production of Hyaluronic Acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 16, n. 12, p. 1849–1855, 2006.

KRAHULEC, J.; KRAHULCOVÁ, J. Increase in hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus strain deficient in β-glucuronidase in laboratory conditions. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 71, n. 4, p. 415–422, 2006.

LAI, Z.-W. et al. Medium formulation and impeller design on the biosynthesis of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus ATCC 39920. African Journal of Microbiology Research, v. 5, n. 15, p. 2114–2123, 2011.

LAI, Z. W.; TEO, C. H. Cloning and expression of hyaluronan synthase (hasA) in recombinant Escherichia coli BL21 and its hyaluronic acid production in shake flask culture. Malaysian Journal of Microbiology, v. 15, n. 7, p. 575–582, 2019.

LI, Y. et al. Regulation of hyaluronic acid molecular weight and titer by temperature in engineered Bacillus subtilis. 3 Biotech, v. 9, n. 6, p. 225, 2019.

LIAO, Y.-H. et al. Hyaluronan: Pharmaceutical Characterization and Drug Delivery. Drug Delivery, v. 12, n. 6, p. 327–342, 1 jan. 2005.

LIU, J. et al. Efficient production of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid with a two-stage fermentation. RSC Advances, v. 8, n. 63, p. 36167–36171, 2018.

LIU, L. et al. Influence of hyaluronidase addition on the production of hyaluronic acid by batch culture of Streptococcuszooepidemicus. Food Chemistry, v. 110, n. 4, p. 923–926, 2008a.

LIU, L. et al. Enhanced hyaluronic acid production of Streptococcus zooepidemicus by an intermittent alkaline‐stress strategy. Letters in Applied Microbiology, v. 46, n. 3, p. 383–388, 2008b.

LIU, L. et al. Influence of culture modes on the microbial production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, v. 13, n. 3, p. 269, 2008c.

LIU, L. et al. Enhanced hyaluronic acid production by a two-stage culture strategy based on the modeling of batch and fed-batch cultivation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Bioresource Technology, v. 99, n. 17, p. 8532–8536, 2008d.

LIU, L. et al. Comparative study on the influence of dissolved oxygen control approaches on the microbial hyaluronic acid production of Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, v. 32, n. 6, p. 755–763, 2009a.

LIU, L. et al. Enhancement of Hyaluronic Acid Production by Batch Culture of Streptococcus zooepidemicus via the addition of n-Dodecane as an Oxygen Vector. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 19, n. 6, p. 596–603, 2009b.

LIU, L. et al. Microbial production of low molecular weight hyaluronic acid by adding hydrogen peroxide and ascorbate in batch culture of Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Bioresource Technology, v. 100, n. 1, p. 362–367, 2009c.

LIU, L. et al. Statistical modeling and optimization for enhanced hyaluronic acid production by batch culture of Sreptococcus zooepidemicus via the supplement of uracil. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, v. 3, n. 4, p. 351, 2009d.

LIU, L. et al. Enhanced Hyaluronic Acid Production of Streptococcus zooepidemicus by Shifting Dissolved Oxygen Level Based on Broth Rheology and Oxygen Mass Transfer Characteristics. Food Biotechnology, v. 23, n. 2, p. 148–161, 11 maio 2009e.

LU, J. F. et al. Highly efficient production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus R42 derived from heterologous expression of bacterial haemoglobin and mutant selection. Letters in Applied Microbiology, v. 62, n. 4, p. 316–322, 1 abr. 2016.

MEI, J. et al. A simple method for the production of low molecular weight hyaluronan by in situ degradation in fermentation broth. e-Polymers, v. 19, n. 1, p. 477–481, 2019.

MOHAN, N. et al. Calorespirometric investigation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus metabolism: Thermodynamics of anabolic payload contribution by growth and hyaluronic acid synthesis. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 152, p. 107367, 2019.

MOHAN, N. et al. Deciphering the role of dissolved oxygen and N-acetyl glucosamine in governing higher molecular weight hyaluronic acid synthesis in Streptococcus zooepidemicus cell factory. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, v. 104, n. 8, p. 3349–3365, abr. 2020.

MOHAN, N.; BALAKRISHNAN, R.; SIVAPRAKASAM, S. Optimization and effect of dairy industrial waste as media components in the production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus thermophilus. Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology, v. 46, n. 6, p. 628–638, 17 ago. 2016.

NIMROD, A. et al. Method of producing high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate by fermentation of streptococcusUSA, 1986.

OZCAN, A.; GERMEC, M.; TURHAN, I. Optimization and kinetic modeling of media composition for hyaluronic acid production from carob extract with Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, v. 45, n. 12, p. 2019–2029, 2022.

PAN, N. C. et al. Improvement Production of Hyaluronic Acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus in Sugarcane Molasses. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, v. 182, n. 1, p. 276–293, 2017.

PAN, N. C. et al. Factorial design in fermentation medium development for hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus . Acta Scientiarum. Technology, v. 42, n. 1 SE-Biotechnology, 3 out. 2019.

PATIL, K. P.; KAMALJA, K. K.; CHAUDHARI, B. L. Optimization of medium components for hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus MTCC 3523 using a statistical approach. Carbohydrate Polymers, v. 86, n. 4, p. 1573–1577, 2011.

PIRES, A. M. B.; EGUCHI, S. Y.; SANTANA, M. H. A. The Influence of Mineral Ions on the Microbial Production and Molecular Weight of Hyaluronic Acid. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, v. 162, n. 8, p. 2125–2135, 2010.

PIRES, A. M. B.; SANTANA, M. H. A. Metabolic Effects of the Initial Glucose Concentration on Microbial Production of Hyaluronic Acid. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, v. 162, n. 6, p. 1751–1761, 2010.

PIRES, A. M. B.; SANTANA, M. H. A. Rheological aspects of microbial hyaluronic acid. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, v. 122, n. 1, p. 126–133, 5 out. 2011.

POURZARDOSHT, N.; RASAEE, M. J. Improved Yield of High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid Production in a Stable Strain of Streptococcus zooepidemicus via the Elimination of the Hyaluronidase-Encoding Gene. Molecular Biotechnology, v. 59, n. 6, p. 192–199, 2017.

RAMPRATAP, P. et al. Production of isotopically enriched high molecular weight hyaluronic acid and characterization by solid-state NMR. Carbohydrate Polymers, v. 316, p. 121063, 2023.

RATHINAVELU, S.; PAVAN, S. S.; SIVAPRAKASAM, S. Hybrid Model-based Framework for Soft Sensing and Forecasting Key Process Variables in the Production of Hyaluronic Acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, v. 28, n. 1, p. 203–214, 2023.

ROHIT, S. G. et al. Kinetic modeling of hyaluronic acid production in palmyra palm (Borassus flabellifer) based medium by Streptococcus zooepidemicus MTCC 3523. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 137, p. 284–293, 2018.

SAHARKHIZ, S.; BABAEIPOUR, V. The dilution effect of media culture on mixing time, Kla O2, and hyaluronic acid production in S. zooepidemicus fed-batch culture. Biotechnology Letters, v. 43, n. 12, p. 2217–2222, 2021.

SAHARKHIZ, S.; BABAEIPOUR, V. Optimization Feed Composition on Hyaluronic Acid Production of in-Batch and Fed-Batch Cultures of Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, v. 41, n. 8, p. 2728–2734, 2022.

SAMADI, M. et al. Enhanced hyaluronic acid production in Streptococcus zooepidemicus by an optimized culture medium containing hyaluronidase inhibitor. Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology, v. 52, n. 4, p. 413–423, 1 abr. 2022.

SCHIRALDI, C. et al. Hyaluronic acid degradation during initial steps of downstream processing. Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, v. 28, n. 1, p. 83–89, 1 jan. 2010.

SHAH, M. V; BADLE, S. S.; RAMACHANDRAN, K. B. Hyaluronic acid production and molecular weight improvement by redirection of carbon flux towards its biosynthesis pathway. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 80, p. 53–60, 2013.

SHUKLA, P. et al. Hyaluronic acid production by utilizing agro-industrial waste cane molasses. 3 Biotech, v. 12, n. 9, p. 208, 2022.

SZE, J. H.; BROWNLIE, J. C.; LOVE, C. A. Biotechnological production of hyaluronic acid: a mini review. 3 Biotech, v. 6, n. 1, p. 67, 2016.

TIWARI, S.; BAHADUR, P. Modified hyaluronic acid based materials for biomedical applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, v. 121, p. 556–571, 2019.

TORRES-ACOSTA, M. A. et al. Comparative Economic Analysis Between Endogenous and Recombinant Production of Hyaluronic Acid. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, v. 9, p. 659, 2021.

WANG, J. et al. Sucrose-modified iron nanoparticles for highly efficient microbial production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, v. 205, p. 111854, 2021.

WEIGEL, P. H.; KYOSSEV, Z.; TORRES, L. C. Phospholipid Dependence and Liposome Reconstitution of Purified Hyaluronan Synthase*. Journal of Biological Chemistry, v. 281, n. 48, p. 36542–36551, 2006.

WESTBROOK, A. W. et al. Engineering of cell membrane to enhance heterologous production of hyaluronic acid in Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology and bioengineering, v. 115, n. 1, p. 216–231, jan. 2018a.

WESTBROOK, A. W. et al. Application of hydrocarbon and perfluorocarbon oxygen vectors to enhance heterologous production of hyaluronic acid in engineered Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, v. 115, n. 5, p. 1239–1252, 1 maio 2018b.

YAO, Z.-Y. et al. Genetic variation reveals the enhanced microbial hyaluronan biosynthesis via atmospheric and room temperature plasma. Carbohydrate Polymers, v. 312, p. 120809, 2023.

YU, F. et al. Recent Advances in the Physicochemical Properties and Biotechnological Application of Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin. Microorganisms, v. 9, n. 7, 2021.

ZAKERI, A.; RASAEE, M. J.; POURZARDOSHT, N. Enhanced hyluronic acid production in Streptococcus zooepidemicus by over expressing HasA and molecular weight control with Niscin and glucose. Biotechnology Reports, v. 16, p. 65–70, 2017.

ZHANG, J.; HAO, N.; CHEN, G.-Q. Effect of expressing polyhydroxybutyrate synthesis genes (phbCAB) in Streptococcus zooepidemicus on production of lactic acid and hyaluronic acid. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 71, n. 2, p. 222–227, 2006.

ZHANG, X. et al. Construction of efficient Streptococcus zooepidemicus strains for hyaluoronic acid production based on identification of key genes involved in sucrose metabolism. AMB Express, v. 6, n. 1, p. 121, 2016.

ZHANG, X.; DUAN, X.-J.; TAN, W.-S. Mechanism for the effect of agitation on the molecular weight of hyaluronic acid produced by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Food Chemistry, v. 119, n. 4, p. 1643–1646, 2010.

ZHANG, Y. et al. Efficient production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus using two-stage semi-continuous fermentation. Bioresource Technology, v. 377, p. 128896, 2023.

ZHENG, Y. et al. Enhancing single-cell hyaluronic acid biosynthesis by microbial morphology engineering. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology, v. 5, n. 4, p. 316–323, 2020.

Published

2024-03-27

How to Cite

Harth, M. L., Furlan, F. F., & Horta, A. C. L. (2024). Microbial hyaluronic acid production in the 21 century: a roadmap toward high production, tailored molecular weight. OBSERVATÓRIO DE LA ECONOMÍA LATINOAMERICANA, 22(3), e3913. https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv22n3-185

Issue

Section

Articles