Method to identify stakeholders in an innovation environment


  • Anderson Ricardo Silvestro
  • Eduardo Mazzuco
  • Clarissa Stefani Teixeira



innovation habitat, living lab, mechanism, identification, stakeholders


Cities have numerous problems associated with the development, they are often difficult to be solved given that they involve various actors of the local ecosystem, such as mobility, infrastructure, and pollution, among others. In the literature, there is the notion of classifying stakeholders, although they do not observe its application in Living Lab (LL) projects. This typology of innovation habitat helps companies test their innovative products and services before launching them into the market. Managing stakeholders is crucial in this process in order for there to be effectiveness, legitimacy, and business ethics. Thus, this article sought to develop a practical tool to map the processes, methods, and criteria used to identify LL stakeholders through a literature review. Our findings revealed a knowledge gap with LL, enabling us to create a process that assists in identifying LL stakeholders.


Achterkamp, M. C., & Vos, J. F. (2007). Critically identifying stakeholders: evaluating boundary critique as a vehicle for stakeholder identification. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 24(1), 3-14.

Åström, J., Ruoppila, S., Ertiö, T., Karlsson, M., & Thiel, S. K. (2015). Potentials and challenges of a living lab approach in research on mobile participation. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 795-800).

Ballejos, L. C., & Montagna, J. M. (2008). Method for stakeholder identification in interorganizational environments. Requirements engineering, 13(4), 281-297.

Bittner, K., & Spence, I. (2003). Use case modeling. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Choi, C., Kim, E. Y., Lee, E. J., Kim, S. M., & Lee, N. G. (2017). Pohang living lab: Utilizing modeling and simulation as a collaboration method. In 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of management review, 20(1), 92-117.

Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of business ethics, 102(1), 77-87.

Duggan, D. E., Farnsworth, K. D., & Kraak, S. B. (2013). Identifying functional stakeholder clusters to maximise communication for the ecosystem approach to fisheries management. Marine Policy, 42, 56-67.

Fritz, M. M., Rauter, R., Baumgartner, R. J., & Dentchev, N. (2018). A supply chain perspective of stakeholder identification as a tool for responsible policy and decision-making. Environmental science & policy, 81, 63-76.

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of management review, 24(2), 191-205.

Galvão, C. M., Sawada, N. O., & Trevizan, M. A. (2004). Revisão sistemática: recurso que proporciona a incorporação das evidências na prática da enfermagem. Revista Latino-americana de enfermagem, 12, 549-556.

Garcia, E. (2016). Pesquisa bibliográfica versus revisão bibliográfica-uma discussão necessária. Línguas & Letras, 17(35).

Giang, T. T. H., Camargo, M., Dupont, L., & Mayer, F. (2017, June). A review of methods for modelling shared decision-making process in a smart city living lab. In 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 189-194). IEEE.

Giannouli, I., Tourkolias, C., Zuidema, C., Tasopoulou, A., Blathra, S., Salemink, K., ... & Koutsomarkos, N. (2018). A methodological approach for holistic energy planning using the living lab concept: the case of the prefecture of Karditsa. European Journal of Environmental Sciences, 8(1), 14-22.

Gil, A. C. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (Vol. 4, p. 175). São Paulo: Atlas.

Gil, A. C. (2008). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. Ediitora Atlas SA.

Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business ethics quarterly, 53-73.

Gregory, A. J., Atkins, J. P., Midgley, G., & Hodgson, A. M. (2020). Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(1), 321-340.

Jackson, G., Gallacher, S., Wilson, D., & McCann, J. A. (2017). Tales from the wild: Lessons learned from creating a living lab. In Proceedings of the First ACM International Workshop on the Engineering of Reliable, Robust, and Secure Embedded Wireless Sensing Systems (pp. 62-68).

Lai, H. J., Kuan, Y. S., & Hu, K. K. (2009). The service science exploitation and experimental design on a city level innovation: A practice of living lab on Taipei City intelligent life scheme. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1263-1267). IEEE.

Leminen, S., Nyström, A. G., & Westerlund, M. (2020). Change processes in open innovation networks–Exploring living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 701-718.

Mazzuco, E. (2020). Processo de identificação de stakeholders em um living lab. (Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso). Curso de Graduação em Engenharia de Materiais, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886.

Müller, C., Hornung, D., Hamm, T., & Wulf, V. (2015, April). Practice-based design of a neighborhood portal: Focusing on elderly tenants in a city quarter living lab. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2295-2304).

Nesterova, N., & Quak, H. (2016). A city logistics living lab: a methodological approach. Transportation Research Procedia, 16, 403-417.

Niitamo, V. P., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M., & Hribernik, K. A. (2006). State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. In 2006 IEEE international technology management conference (ICE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

Niitamo, V. P., Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. (2012). A small-firm perspective on the benefits of living labs.

Pacheco, C., & Garcia, I. (2012). A systematic literature review of stakeholder identification methods in requirements elicitation. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(9), 2171-2181.

Parent, M. M., & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of business ethics, 75(1), 1-23.

Perrault, E. (2017). A ‘names-and-faces approach’to stakeholder identification and salience: A matter of status. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 25-38.

Quak, H., Lindholm, M., Tavasszy, L., & Browne, M. (2016). From freight partnerships to city logistics living labs–Giving meaning to the elusive concept of living labs. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 461-473.

Salado, A., & Nilchiani, R. (2013). Contextual-and behavioral-centric stakeholder identification. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 908-917.

Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A., & Galal, G. (1999, September). Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. In Proceedings. Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 99 (pp. 387-391). IEEE.

Ståhlbröst, A., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Ihlström-Eriksson, C. (2015). Stakeholders in smart city living lab processes. In Americas Conference on Information Systems: 13/08/2015-15/08/2015. Americas Conference on Information Systems.

Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy.

Vérilhac, I., Pallot, M., & Aragall, F. (2012, June). IDeALL: Exploring the way to integrate design for all within living labs. In 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

Wang, W., Liu, W., & Mingers, J. (2015). A systemic method for organisational stakeholder identification and analysis using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). European Journal of Operational Research, 246(2), 562-574.

Wolfe, R. A., & Putler, D. S. (2002). How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups?. Organization science, 13(1), 64-80.

Xie, X., & Wang, H. (2021). How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 124, 299-311.

Zheng, L. J., Fan, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, W. (2021). Born innovator? How founder birth order influences product innovation generation and adoption in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Research, 136, 414-430.

Zheng, L., Ulrich, K., & Sendra-García, J. (2021). Qualitative comparative analysis: Configurational paths to innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 128, 83-93.




How to Cite

Silvestro , A. R., Mazzuco, E., & Teixeira , C. S. (2023). Method to identify stakeholders in an innovation environment. OBSERVATÓRIO DE LA ECONOMÍA LATINOAMERICANA, 21(9), 13584–13604.