Evaluation of technologies for oncology medicines: how value is assessed

Authors

  • João Leandro Cássio de Oliveira
  • Ana Paula Barros Silva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv22n2-035

Keywords:

technology valuation, technology transfer, university and company relationship, oncological drugs

Abstract

Pricing or understanding the value of a technology is a very complex activity, after all, valuation is a multidisciplinary activity. This activity is inserted in the broad context of science, technology and innovation, which requires knowledge of several tools. Therefore, this manuscript aims to answer which technology valuation models are applicable, in technology transfer, in the oncology drugs sector. To achieve success, a documentary study was carried out, mapping the main manuscripts focused on this topic. The research was carried out through surveys in the Scopus database and VOSviewer was used to formulate the citation network. It was concluded, in terms of results, that analytical methods are best applied to the proposed objective, it was also possible to understand that valuation is not a single process, but a set of criteria that allows the analyst to know the various methods and various possibilities application of methodologies in the context of technology transfer.

References

ANDRIESSEN, D. IC valuation and measurement: classifying the state of the art. Journal of Intellectual Capital, v. 5, n. 2, p.230–242, 2004.

BAEK, D. H.; SUL, W.; HONG, K. P.; KIM, H. A Technology Valuation Model to Support Technology Transfer Negotiations. R&D Management, v. 37, n. 2, p. 123-138, 2007.

BANERJEE, A.; BAKSHI, R.; SANYAL, M. K. Valuation of patent: A classification of methodologies. Research Bulletin, v. 42, n. 4, p. 158-174, 2017.

BLACK, F., SCHOLES, M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, n81, p. 637-659, 1973.

BOER, F. P. The valuation of technology: business and financial issues in R&D. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999. BULAKOWSKI, A.J., Decoding Patent Valuation. Intellectual Property Magazine, 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.intellectualpropertymagazine.com/strategy/ decoding-patent-valuation-102879.htm>. Acesso em: 07 out. 2019.

CABRERA, E. A. M.; ARELLANO A. Technology valuation at universities: Difficulties and proposals. Contaduría y Administración, v. 64, n. 1 (Especial Innovación), p. 1-17, 2019.

CHIESA, V.; GILARDONI, E. The Valuation of Technology in Buy Cooperate-Sell Decisions. European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 8, n. 1, p. 5-30, 2005.

CHIU, Y. J.; CHEN, Y. W. Using AHP in patent valuation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, v. 46, n. 7 e 8, p. 1054-1062, 2007.

COPELAND, T.; ANTIKAROV, V. Real Options: A Practitioner’s Guide. London: Texere, 2001.

DAMORADAN, A. Avaliação de empresas. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.

DELOITTE. 2017 Global Life Sciences Outlook. 2017.

DISSEL, M. C., PROBERT, D. R. Y.; MITCHELL, R. From Gut Feel to Educated Approximations: Towards an Integrated Approach for Technology Valuation. PICMET 2008. Proceeding. Cape Town, 2008. p. 2073-2080.

DIXIT, A.; PINDYCK, R. The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review, 105-118, 1995.

ETZKOWITZ, H. Hélice Tríplice: universidade-indústria-governo: inovação em movimento. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2009.

FICHMAN, R. G. Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice. Information Systems Research, v. 15, n. 2, p. 132-154, 2004.

FLATT, J. W.; BLASIMME, A.; VAYENA, E. Improving the Measurement of Scientific Success by Reporting a Self-Citation Index. Publications, v. 5, n. 3, 2017.

FREY, I. A.; FREY, M. R. A Mensuração do Ativo Intangível Responsabilidade Social Empresarial. Revista Brasileira de Contabilidade, v. 138, p. 45-55, 2002.

GIL, A.C. Como classificar as pesquisas? In: ___. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisas. 4 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002. p. 44-45

GOLDSCHEIDER, R.; JAROSZ, J.; MULHERN, C. Use of the 25% Rule in Valuing Intellectual Property. In: SMITH, G.; PARR, R. (Eds.). Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation, and Infringement Damages. Hoboken: Wiley, 2005. p. 410-426.

HAGELIN, TED. A New Method to Value Intellectual Property. AIPLA Quarterly Journal, v. 30, n. 3, p. 353-403, 2002.

HANEL, P. Intellectual property rights business management practices: A survey of the literature. Technovation, v. 26, n. 8, p. 895-931, 2006.

HASTBACKA, M. A. Technology Valuation – The Market Comparables Method. Technology Management Journal June, 1–4, 2004.

HE, Z.; LEI, Z.: WANG, D. Modeling citation dynamics of “atypical” articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2018.

HONG, S. J.; WON, S. J.: SUK K.Y.; Y HYEOK, K. S. Construction Technology Valuation for Patent Transaction. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, n. 14, v. 2, p. 111-122, 2010.

HUNG. S. C; TSENG S. C. A new framework integrating environmental effects into technology evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 10, 2010.

LITAN, R.; WALLISON, P. Beyond the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – GAAP. Regulation, 2003.

MARD, M. J. Financial Factors – Cost Approach to Valuing Intellectual Property. Licensing Journal August, 27-28, 2000.

MURPHY, W. J.; ORCUTT, J. L. Y; REMUS, P.C. Patent Valuation: Improving Decision Making through Analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

NEWMAN, M. E. J. Networks: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

OLIVEIRA, J.L.C. Valoração de tecnologias no cenário de transferência de tecnologia entre universidade e empresa no Brasil: uma metodologia proposta. Tese de Doutorado do Programa de Inovação Tecnológica e Biofarmacutica da UFMG. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/35783 Acesso em 27 de maio de 2021.

PALMEIRA FILHO, P.L. et al. O desafio do financiamento à inovação farmacêutica noBrasil: a experiência do BNDES Profarma. Revista do BNDES, v.37, p. 67-90, junho de 2012.

PARK, Y.; PARK, G. A New Method for Technology Valuation in Monetary Value: Procedure and Application. Technovation, p. 387–394, 2004.

PARR, R. L.; SMITH, G. V. Quantitative Methods of Valuing Intellectual Property. In: SIMENSKY, M.; BRYER, L. G. (Eds.). The new role of intellectual property in commercial transactions. New York: John Wiley, 1994. p. 39-68.

PITKETHLY, R. H. The valuation of patents: a review of patent valuation methods with consideration of option-based methods and the potential for further research. Cambridge: The Judge Institute of Management Studies, 1997.

RAZGAITIS, R. Pricing the intellectual property of early-stage technologies: a primer of basic valuation tools and considerations. Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation. In: KRATTIGER, A.; MAHONEY, R.T.; NELSEN, L. (Eds.). Handbook of Best Practices, Chapter 9.3, MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford and Davis, CA, 2007.

RAZGAITIS, R .Valuation and Princing of Technology-Based Intellectual Property. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

SALERNO, M. S.; MATSUMOTO, C.; FERRAZ, I. Biofármacos no Brasil: características, importância e delineamento de políticas para seu desenvolvimento. Brasília: Ipea, 2018. (Texto para Discussão, n. 2398).

SANTOS, D. T. E.; SANTIAGO, L. P. Avaliar x valorar novas tecnologias: desmistificando conceitos. Laboratório de Apoio à Decisão e Confiabilidade, Departamento de Engenharia de Produção. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2008.

STOKES, E. D. O quadrante de Pasteur: ciência básica e a inovação Tecnológica. Trad. José Emílio Maiorino. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 2005.

THORN, V.; HUNT, F.; MITCHELL, R.; PROBERT, D.; PHAAL, R. Internal technology valuation: real world issues. Int. J. Technol. Manage, v. 53, n. 2-4, p.149-160, 2011.

VASCONCELLOS, E. P. Valoração de intangíveis no contexto de negociação e transferência de tecnologias desenvolvidas em universidades públicas brasileiras. 2015. 61 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Inovação Tecnológica e Propriedade Intelectual) Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2015.

VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. 2009. Disponível em: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3>. Acesso em: 21 maio de 2020.

VEGA-GONZÁLEZ, L. R.; SANIGER BLESA, J. M. Valuation methodology for technology developed at academic R&D groups. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, v. 8, n. 1, p. 26-43, 2010

VIEIRA, FABIOLA SULPINO (2022). Políticas de fomento ao desenvolvimento de fármacos e medicamentos no Brasil: Panorama de 1998 a 2020, Texto para Discussão, No. 2783, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA), Brasília,

WANG, B.; HSIEH, C. H. Measuring The Value Of Patents With Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 92, p. 263-275, 2015.

YUN, D.; PARK, I.; YOON, B. Development of a technology valuation method for buyers in technology transfer. J. Korea Acad.-Ind. Coop. Soc., v. 17, p. 155-167, 2016.

Published

2024-02-07

How to Cite

de Oliveira, J. L. C., & Silva, A. P. B. (2024). Evaluation of technologies for oncology medicines: how value is assessed. OBSERVATÓRIO DE LA ECONOMÍA LATINOAMERICANA, 22(2), e3118. https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv22n2-035

Issue

Section

Articles